Skip to content

Case Studies

Flagship case studies

Personal Project

LLM Data Leakage Lab

A deliberately vulnerable LLM-enabled Flask application, built to demonstrate a real cross-user data leakage vulnerability class and then measure three progressively stronger defenses against it: identity trust, context isolation, input risk inspection, output redaction, and structured security logging. The vulnerable baseline is preserved unmodified so the 'before' stays real and reproducible; the defended modes are implemented alongside it, not in place of it, so the same attack set can be replayed against all three and compared directly.

Outcome: Unauthorized cross-user disclosure measured at 25% under the original vulnerable baseline, dropping to 0% once context isolation is added (Partial Defense) -- the full Defense-in-Depth mode adds pre-model risk-based blocking, output redaction, and resolves identity from a server-side session token rather than a client-declared field, which is what stops a separate identity-spoofing (IDOR) vector the first two modes both leave open.

Unauthorized disclosure rate -- Vulnerable Baseline:
25% (3/12 adversarial cases)
Unauthorized disclosure rate -- Partial Defense (context isolation only):
0% (0/12 adversarial cases)
Unauthorized disclosure rate -- Defense in Depth:
0% (0/12 adversarial cases)
Identity-spoofing (IDOR) case blocked:
Only Defense in Depth (1/1); Baseline and Partial Defense both allow it
Adversarial requests blocked before reaching the model -- Defense in Depth:
33% (4/12)
View repository →
Research

Adaptive Moving Target Defense for LLM Security

MSc research applying Adaptive Moving Target Defense (AMTD) to secure LLM-enabled systems against prompt injection, jailbreak attempts, and sensitive data leakage. The design compares a static baseline, a fixed-defense baseline, and an adaptive AMTD condition, introducing controlled changes to the defensive prompt layer, route-selection logic, and response handling based on assessed input risk -- combining prompt risk analysis, adaptive prompt wrapping, prompt randomization, and layered defense to reduce attacker predictability. Methodology in progress, per dated research-update posts: deploying a lower-cost local model alongside a stronger API-based model with an adaptive switching mechanism that escalates requests based on assessed risk; a risk-scoring pipeline that selects a defensive response by severity; red-team attack integration via Promptfoo, with broader testing planned using Garak and PyRIT; comparison of static vs. adaptive defense strategies measured on attack success rate, benign-task performance, latency, cost, routing behaviour, and resilience; a multi-judge evaluation design with an adjudicator for disagreement cases; and a canary-string method (planting a unique marker inside protected context and checking whether adversarial prompts cause the model to reveal it) as a data-leak detection technique. Candidate models evaluated for the pipeline (via Hugging Face) include deepset/deberta-v3-base-injection, meta-llama/Prompt-Guard-86M, several openai/gpt-oss variants, and zai-org/GLM-5.2.

Outcome: Research in progress -- attack-success-rate, latency, and resilience results are not yet finalized.

Research

Three-Layer Defense Framework for Secure LLM Applications

A layered security framework for LLM-enabled applications designed and evaluated to reduce prompt injection, unauthorized data access, and sensitive information leakage, implementing three defensive layers: Context Isolation (restricts model access to only the data a user is authorized to view), Prompt Sanitization (detects and filters malicious or manipulative user inputs before they reach the model), and Response Redaction (masks or blocks sensitive information if the model attempts to expose it in its output). Testing different layer combinations showed that a single control provides only limited protection, and that stronger security comes from combining multiple defenses around the LLM rather than assuming the model itself can enforce trust boundaries.

Outcome: Key finding: single-layer controls under-perform combined, defense-in-depth layering -- the same architectural pattern independently measured end-to-end in the LLM Data Leakage Lab.

Academic Project

AI-Generated Voice / Deepfake Fraud Evidence Triage

A course final project building a triage application for suspected AI-generated (deepfake) audio and video evidence, exploring how investigators could systematically assess such evidence rather than relying on ad hoc review. The application performs SHA-256 hashing to preserve evidence integrity, extracts metadata, applies rule-based triage to identify indicators warranting further investigation, and produces structured forensic findings.

Outcome: Final grade: 95/100 (Digital Forensics course capstone project).

Academic Project

Machine Learning-Based Malware Classification & APT Attribution

A threat intelligence project classifying malware samples by their associated Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) groups using opcode-based analysis. Workflow: Dataset Creation (extracted and cleaned opcode text from malware samples, mapped each to its corresponding APT group, building a structured dataset of file hashes, APT labels, and opcode text features); Feature Engineering (converted opcode sequences into numerical features using unigram and bigram representations); Model Training (trained and compared multiple classifiers -- Support Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbours, and Decision Tree); Evaluation (assessed performance using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and confusion matrices); and a Threat Intelligence Focus exploring how malware behaviour patterns can support attribution and help analysts connect samples to known adversary groups.

Outcome: Reinforced the applied value of machine learning in cyber threat intelligence -- malware triage, pattern recognition, and early-stage attribution support.

Additional case studies

Professional, academic, and personal-project evidence with its own dedicated page, distinct from the flagship research above.

Professional ExperienceProfessional

Application Security Analyst — wHTa Networks

Current, paid role focused on identifying, mitigating, and preventing vulnerabilities across web applications and CI/CD pipelines, applying a frontend development background to bridge engineering and security. Work spans SAST/DAST assessment (XSS, CSRF, injection flaws) early in the SDLC; enforcing secure coding practices aligned to OWASP Top 10 and CWE/SANS with developers, including remediation guidance and fix verification; secure authentication/authorization flow design (least privilege, session hardening, token management); reviewing API endpoints and client-server data transmission (HTTPS/TLS, input validation, output encoding); embedding security controls and automated vulnerability detection into CI/CD with DevOps/engineering teams; implementing CSPs and secure headers against client-side and browser-based attacks; and delivering internal security training and reviews.

Outcome: Ongoing role since Mar 2025.

Academic Lab

Penetration Testing and Exploit Development Lab Series

A hands-on lab series covering exploit development, reconnaissance, vulnerability assessment, exploitation, post-exploitation, authentication attacks, man-in-the-middle simulation, and web application security testing in a controlled VM lab. Exploit Development Basics: used GDB to inspect vulnerable programs, analyze memory behavior, and understand buffer overflow/logic-bypass outcomes. Reconnaissance and Enumeration: Maltego, Nmap, and Wireshark for DNS enumeration, host discovery, OS detection, and packet capture analysis. Vulnerability Assessment: OpenVAS/GVM and Nessus scans against Windows targets, with before/after comparison across system and firewall changes. Exploitation and Post-Exploitation: privilege escalation, process migration, persistence testing, hash dumping, and event log analysis in Windows lab environments. Authentication Attacks: Metasploit/Meterpreter, Kiwi, Cain & Abel, John the Ripper, Hashcat, and Hydra. Network Attack Simulation: Ettercap for ARP poisoning, DNS spoofing, and traffic redirection. Web Application Security Testing: SQL injection, authentication bypass, UNION-based extraction, XSS, CSRF, and IDOR-style access-control weaknesses against vulnerable web applications.

Personal Project

Full-Stack Development Projects

My Developer Portfolio (Feb–Dec 2025, personal project): the previous version of this portfolio site (github.com/Azubikeamala/My-Portfolio) -- a React + Tailwind CSS site with animated backgrounds and smooth scrolling, deployed via Vercel. Osita.pro – Wonder World for Kids (Jul–Dec 2025, personal project): an interactive children's learning/play site (React + Tailwind CSS, hosted on Vercel) with categories including Math Missions, Craft Lab, Story Time, and Brain Boosters. Car Tracker App (Apr 2025, Conestoga group project): a Framework7 + Firebase web app for tracking car purchase plans in real time, with Email/Password and Google OAuth 2.0 authentication and Firebase Realtime Database sync. Live demo: car-tracker-3aeb5.web.app. Healthy Eating App (Jan–Apr 2025, Conestoga group project): a full-stack meal-planning app (React/Tailwind frontend, Django/PostgreSQL backend) with categorized recipes, downloadable CSV meal plans/shopping lists, and an AI-powered support chatbot. Hosted at healthyeating.help. Password Hashing and Secure Credential Storage Demonstration (Jan–Apr 2026, University of Guelph coursework): a presentation and demo covering password hashing, hash function properties, login verification, and data-breach protection in real-world authentication systems.